Seven of Nine.
Jadzia Dax in Duty Uniform
Oh, and the core characters that have never been made well (which is, of course, all of them).
Just give me a bunch of nice TOS figures.
Kirk, Spock and McCoy, TOS style, that's all I ask for
Nacelle Toys is looking for input on what figures they should do for their second wave of 1/12 Star Trek figures. Let them know at
I'd say to that, work on wave 1 first...if you're realizing you DO need to have core characters, and asking if articulated figures should have torso movement, some basics need to be covered before venturing out. Collectors want this to be a success for the company, so take it easy and get it right the first time out. We're rooting for ya!
Yes, If it actually works and doesnt look too bad
For the sake of use, it'd be fine to have if this kind of ab crunch if the company ever releases a captain's chair or com station for a figure to sit at where it would actually be used. But otherwise, as a static figure, it's not really needed - especially if it's gonna cost customers more for extra tooling.
Technically, i dont even think this is a proper ab crunch. But whatever, yeah. There should be some kind of mid-torso articulation. However they do it, just make sure there's actually a decent range of movement. Dont make it like super 7's silverhawks where, technically it exists but the range of movement is near non-existent. So much so that they could've just as well not included it.
20 minutes ago, Jscott991 said:Because it looks terrible and is basically useless except for super specific action-oriented poses.
I don't see how to vote in any poll, but I hope they drop it.
There is no poll. One votes by saying yes or no in the Facebook thread.
33 minutes ago, Reno said:This seems like a silly question. Why would they not include it?
Because it looks terrible and is basically useless except for super specific action-oriented poses.
I don't see how to vote in any poll, but I hope they drop it.
This seems like a silly question. Why would they not include it?
